aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/routes
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAdam Soltys <[email protected]>2026-08-22 08:04:06 -0700
committerAdam Soltys <[email protected]>2026-08-22 08:04:06 -0700
commit38bfeeecdafb678d2a495c2865d1ff4dd6255ac9 (patch)
treedc2b9849e0c8c0825f820e60ab815bb10c7131ef /routes
parent51b9f1a267a682a86e528bef424b245c63e5cb19 (diff)
downloadcoinos-server-38bfeeecdafb678d2a495c2865d1ff4dd6255ac9.tar.gz
coinos-server-38bfeeecdafb678d2a495c2865d1ff4dd6255ac9.zip
confirm: never re-credit receive outputs on wallet-funded txs
A transaction our own wallet contributed inputs to carries a "send" detail; every receive output on it is then our own change or an internal move, never an external deposit. Crediting such an output mints phantom balance against funds already in custody — the misclassification an external report flagged in the on-chain send path (wallet ownership is not account ownership). Guard the credit at the settlement layer, which is the correct boundary and covers both bitcoin and liquid uniformly: if the tx has any send detail, skip every receive output (log a tripwire for amounts >= 300 sats so continued probing is visible). Rejecting these at send time instead would break legitimate withdrawals, whose change routinely lands on a reused deposit address that resolves to an invoice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XiwgmQKwKnRxUmVDd4xSf7
Diffstat (limited to 'routes')
-rw-r--r--routes/payments.ts20
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/routes/payments.ts b/routes/payments.ts
index 4f0e7f6e..f8a8adba 100644
--- a/routes/payments.ts
+++ b/routes/payments.ts
@@ -488,6 +488,16 @@ export default {
let aid;
if (!hot) aid = wallet;
+ // Change-recredit guard (2026-08-18). If our own wallet contributed inputs
+ // to this transaction, a "send" detail is present. In that case every
+ // receive output is our own CHANGE or an internal move — never an external
+ // deposit — so it must not be credited: doing so mints phantom balance
+ // (the withdrawal-change re-credit exploit that drove the L-C creep). A
+ // genuine coinos->coinos transfer is settled off-chain in the send path
+ // (credit() resolves getInvoice(hash) and books an internal transfer), so
+ // an on-chain receive funded by our own spend is only ever change.
+ const weSpent = details.some((d: any) => d.category === "send");
+
for (const { address, amount, asset, category, vout } of details) {
if (!address) continue;
if (type === PaymentType.liquid && asset !== config.liquid.btc)
@@ -509,6 +519,16 @@ export default {
continue;
}
+ // See weSpent above: a receive output on a transaction our wallet funded
+ // is change, not a deposit. Skip it so we never re-credit our own funds.
+ // Log the blocked amount as a tripwire: sums the phantom credit prevented
+ // and surfaces any continued exploitation attempts.
+ if (weSpent) {
+ if (sats(amount) >= 300)
+ warn("blocked change re-credit", txid, vout, sats(amount), address);
+ continue;
+ }
+
const p = await getPayment(`${txid}:${vout}`);
if (!p) {