diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/nwc.ts | 27 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 10 deletions
@@ -351,16 +351,23 @@ const parseInstruction = (payment) => { return s.startsWith("ln") ? s : null; }; -// CLN v26.06 adds an experimental `createproof` RPC producing the lnp payer -// proof that NIP-177 zap receipts (kind 9736) embed: createproof(invstring, -// [note], [include]) -> { proofs: [{ bolt12: "lnp..." }] }. Feature-detect -// through the generic call() — on older nodes (current: v25.12) this errors -// and we omit the proof, which the nwc `pay` spec allows. The proof format is -// still draft; once 26.06 is deployed, check whether NIP-177's required -// fields (invreq_payer_note, invoice_amount) need an explicit `include` list. -const createPayerProof = async (invstring: string) => { +// CLN v26.06's experimental `createproof` RPC produces the lnp payer proof +// that NIP-177 zap receipts (kind 9736) embed. The default proof OMITS +// invreq_payer_note, which NIP-177 verification requires disclosed (it binds +// the payment to the zap intent) — and passing `include` REPLACES the default +// disclosure set, so invoice_amount must be re-listed alongside it or the +// amount gets hidden too. Feature-detected through the generic call() — on +// older nodes this errors and we omit the proof, which the nwc `pay` spec +// allows. +const createPayerProof = async ( + invstring: string, + hasPayerNote: boolean = false, +) => { try { - const r = await ln.call("createproof", { invstring }); + const r = await ln.call("createproof", { + invstring, + ...(hasPayerNote && { include: ["invreq_payer_note", "invoice_amount"] }), + }); return r?.proofs?.[0]?.bolt12; } catch (e) { return undefined; @@ -640,7 +647,7 @@ const handle = (method, params, ev, app, user) => // invoice fetched from it) payer_proof: instruction_type === "bolt12" - ? await createPayerProof(p.hash) + ? await createPayerProof(p.hash, !!payer_note) : undefined, created_at, settled_at: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000), |